Takeru Kobayashi, Joey Chestnut And The Rift In Competitive Hot Dog- Eating. UPDATE: Joey Chestnut devoured 6.

Coney Island hot dog- eating contest, while Takeru Kobayashi ate just 6. Takeru Kobayashi was, by all accounts, the competitive eating world's first superstar, winning the 4th of July Nathan's International Hot Dog- Eating Contest title from 2. In his first year of competition, he ate twice as many hot dogs as his closest competitor. Indeed, when competitive eating went mainstream, thanks to ESPN, in 2. Japanese wonder who captured the world's imagination. How could such a small man eat so many hot dogs, everyone wondered. The 3. 5- year- old Nagano, Japan- native was catapulted into a career of binge eating after winning a Japanese TV show.

Apple iPhone 8 release date, price, design and features: Everything we know so far A guide to all of the rumours and gossip surrounding the 2017 Apple iPhone. Watch The Man With Two Brains Putlocker# more. Takeru Kobayashi and Joey Chestnut are unrivaled in hot dog-eating, but they no longer compete together. Here's why. As CNN reports, Scaramucci is getting some help with his broadcast from Fox News co-president Bill Shine, but it’s not yet clear how you’ll be able to watch the.

What has Katie Price done to her face? Loose Women viewers shocked with lift result Mother of five has undergone a special type of face lift at the ripe old age of 39.

He became an overnight sensation in his home country and soon brought his talents to U. S. shores where he is widely credited with popularizing the sport by turning the annual Nathan’s hot dog- eating contest into a must- watch 4th of July event. Yet, a contract dispute has kept him away from the Coney Island Boardwalk for the past three years. Essentially, the winner of five Guinness records - - hot dogs, pasta, meatballs, Twinkies, hamburgers - - refused to go along with what he called overly restrictive limits on endorsements and remuneration imposed by Major League Eating, the international federation that runs the Nathan’s 4th of July Contest and other annual events. Kobayashi has decided to instead navigate the niche industry alone. George Shea, spokesperson for Major League Eating, reiterated in an email to International Business Times, Wednesday, that Kobayashi was never actually banned from the competition.“Kobayashi is not part of our league and so he is not eligible to compete in our events, but we have always welcomed him into our league.

In fact, we have asked him each year if he would like to be part of the league and he has repeatedly declined.“After losing three straight hot dog contests to Joey Chestnut, he left the league, which freed him to go out on his own and exploit his fame in events such as the upcoming Uncle Bob's Self- Storage Cupcake- Eating Contest, which has captivated the attention of nearly all competitive eating fans in the Upper Saddle River, N. J., area,” Shea continued. It’s true. Kobayashi did lose to San Jose- native Joey “Jaws” Chestnut three years in a row. His star power was fading to the point where he ceremoniously stormed the Nathan’s stage in 2. It was a low moment for Kobayashi, but the Japanese champion eater has made somewhat of a comeback over the past two years.

1. “I disavow anything that led to folks getting hurt,” Kessler continued. “It is a sad day in our constitutional democracy when we are not able to have civil.
2. Internet Rumors, Gossip And Misinformation: People Only Want To Read What They Already Believe.

In 2. 01. 1, Chestnut scarfed down 6. Coney Island while his mortal enemy, Kobayashi, ate 6. Fifth in midtown Manhattan. In 2. 01. 2, Chestnut ate 6.

Coney Island while Kobayashi ate 6. Bushwick neighborhood of Brooklyn. Nathan’s officials dismissed both records. This year, Kobayashi is at it again with a 4th of July tournament at Eventi, a Kimpton Hotel, in Chelsea.

You can expect to see a stage full of exceptional eaters and me coming in with a new world record,” he said when IBTimes caught up with him two days before the spectacle. So how do you prepare your body to ingest dozens of hot dogs? I’m preparing by training my stomach to expand to the fullest it can possibly go,” the pro explained. Watch Big Jake Putlocker#. I begin this a couple months prior to the event by drinking water and adjusting the amounts as the days get closer.”Kobayashi has never been shy about marketing himself.

He has starred in commercials for Sports Center, Eight O’Clock Coffee and Master. Card, and appeared on MTV’s True Life, Saturday Night Live and numerous late night shows. Now, he’s getting into the hot dog business.“After the event, I will unveil my brand new hot dog, the Kobi Dog, which is very exciting for me this year,” he said. The Kobi Dog is made with all beef Midwestern grain- fed cattle and perfected to a great snap, bite and taste.” Anyone can buy the snappy new product online from Rastelli Foods Group, beginning Thursday afternoon.

When all is said and done this 4th of July, Chestnut will almost certainly take the mustard yellow belt at the Nathan’s International Hot Dog- Eating Contest in Coney Island. And, Kobayashi will undoubtedly win the title at his own match at the Eventi. There’s really nobody else who comes close to competing against these two at shoving hot dogs down their throats, which is why it’s such a shame that they won’t compete against each other.***This article was updated on July 8 to reflect the location of Uncle Bob’s Self- Storage Cupcake- Eating Contest and the sarcastic tone intended by Major League Eating spokesperson George Shea.

People Only Want To Read What They Already Believe. Did you hear the news? A mass grave with two dozen bodies was found in Texas. Iran is banning the Internet. South Carolina's Gov.

Nikki Haley is under indictment for tax fraud. Jon Bon Jovi is dead. All of these statements are false but were at one time considered to be verified, legitimate facts, believed and shared by many. Worse yet, some people still believe them; you can't easily un- ring the bell of misinformation. Even when hastily broken news is swiftly retracted or corrected, or when fact- checkers quickly untangle, say, a politician's erroneous claim about his opponent, the damage has often been done: In a matter of minutes, a story can take on a life of its own - - regardless of whether or not it is entirely true.

Although some would argue that misinformation is a by- product of the digital age, that's hardly accurate. Watch Pictures Of Superheroes Online Free HD. Individuals, companies, governments, political activists and organizations have long used dubious versions of the truth as currency. However, more recently, the Internet - - with its vast reach, inherent anonymity and breakneck content cycles - - has made spreading gossip and rumors child's play. Yet, none of this would work - - none of the falsehoods would stick - - if it weren't for a quirk in human nature:  We want to hear what we already believe. We watch MSNBC or read the Huffington Post because we want our news tilted leftward. Or we watch Fox News or listen to Rush Limbaugh because we want to see President Barack Obama and social liberals constantly lambasted.

In other words, we seek what we consider the truth, and we look for it in digital echo chambers that reflect our internal biases. People want information to confirm what they already think they know, said Alfred Hermida, a digital media scholar and author of Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Journalism.

The success of the so- called birthers - - many of whom still don't accept the indisputable fact that Obama is a native- born American - - illustrates this point, Hermida says. Why do people buy one newspaper instead of another? Because that newspaper reflects their world outlook more than the competition does. We do this in all of our media choices. Typical of the it sounds true to me so it must be true story is one that, we abashedly admit, was published by IBTimes a month ago.

The article, based on an erroneous report, said that Reza Taghipour, the Iranian minister for Information and Communications Technology, had announced plans to remove public Internet access in Iran and replace it with a state- controlled national portal. The IBT reporter who broke the story cited an April 5 statement on the Farsi- language site Kalame. The story received thousands of page views and was picked up unquestioningly by numerous news outlets before IBT was made aware of an official Iranian denial: In a statement to Agence France- Presse, the Iranian information ministry called the report completely baseless and attributed it to the propaganda wing of the West. IBT updated the story with the denial by the morning after the first report went live, and it published a follow- up story further detailing accusations by Iran's information ministry that the report was based on a misunderstood hoax. Still, throughout that day, multiple news outlets continued to cite the original story without qualification; it remained the Top News result on a Twitter search for Iran until late afternoon.   Even days later, the story - - which some now believe began as an April Fool's joke - - was still clinging to life.

In fact, some people on the Internet remain unconvinced that the ministry's denial of the report truly means public Internet access will not be disrupted by the government. Iran's documented history of censorship likely made it easier for audiences to take the false report seriously. People's proclivity to believe what they want to hear has found the perfect accomplice in microblogging sites such as Twitter and Tumblr. Without fact- checking, legitimate news organizations often report what they read on Twitter - - and all too frequently and uncritically praise microblogging as an essential tool of modern- day reporting - - making the popular site a digitally amplified game of telephone.

In turn, more and more people post misinformation or poorly gathered information on Twitter and other microblogging venues: sometimes innocently, in the rush to get ahead of the news, and sometimes maliciously, as a prank or to further a personal agenda. In June 2. 01. 1, an (evidently) honest - - but critical - - oversight led to a seemingly credible report that a mass grave was found in Texas. This salacious item, not surprisingly, quickly went viral.  Its origin reportedly was a tipster in the Lincoln Country Sheriff's Office who told a local news station that police were investigating a report of 2.

Hardin, Texas. The Houston- based station, KPRC- TV, promptly sent a message via Twitter claiming that dozens of bodies have been found. Before long, national wire services and news outlets like the New York Times and the Associated Press ran with the story. The Times told its followers on Twitter: NYT NEWS ALERT: Up to 3.

Dismembered Bodies Found Near Houston, Reuters Reports. But when investigators and reporters went to the scene, they found no trace of human remains. A deconstruction of the report revealed that the sheriff's office had initially heard about the bogus burial site from a psychic who had a premonition.

The authorities reportedly took the psychic's claims seriously because she had detailed and accurate knowledge of the home and the property where she believed the mass grave to be. It is unclear whether the sheriff's office declined to tell the Houston station that its source was a psychic, or if the station ignored or misunderstood the quality of the source. The Texas mass grave story was ultimately an innocent mistake, at least compared to a case of digital journalistic malpractice involving South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in March, when she was forced to address a damaging rumor claiming that she was facing imminent indictment on tax fraud charges. This rumor was started on a little- known news blog with only one reporter. As a subsequent New York Times story explains, on March 2.

Logan Smith ran an item on his site, the Palmetto Public Record - - which describes itself as a South Carolina- focused blog about politics and policy that goes beyond inflated political rhetoric and he- said/she- said journalism - - claiming that two well- placed legal experts told him that Haley was about to be indicted. Mainstream and widely- read news outlets like Buzz. Feed, whose editor is a former top journalist at Politico, and the Washington Post, broadcast a link to Smith's story via Twitter. This immediately elevated an item that would have likely been lost in the Internet's din - - into a legitimately big story in the mainstream news cycle. The 'news Web' is subject to all of the same natural forces as the rest of the Internet, said Ken Doctor, a media analyst and author of Newsonomics: Twelve New Trends That Will Shape the News You Get. That means everything - - right, wrong or otherwise - - has the potential for getting magnified instantly.

The indictment rumor was ultimately discredited after Haley's office released a letter from the Internal Revenue Service denying a pending tax investigation. Still, rather than backing down, Smith doubled down.